Author: Alex

Ko Papa Ko Rangi: Up or Down?

Reframing the Costs of Climate Change

Work is underway across Aotearoa to quantify the costs of climate change, including the costs of adaptation or of failure to adapt. 

But how do we understand “cost” and will our economic paradigm really lead to effective climate adaptation? If we can’t or don’t quantify/consider some costs of climate change (and benefits of adaptation!), how can we ensure these are factored in our adaptation decisions? 

On the one hand, we need frameworks and tools that help us analyse our adaptation decisions (and indecisions). On the other, we need to consider the paradigm driving our current thinking, and the limits of current economic tools and frameworks to help us make collectively oriented, intergenerational decisions. 

Are we capable of making decisions that return to Papa and Rangi value greater than what we have taken?

What is a rolling symposium? 

This rolling symposium consists of preliminary podcasts, culminating in an all-day event, to generate evidence-based conversation around the economics of  adapting to climate change. In order to build towards an inspiring, productive and free-flowing conversation at our all-day event, we ask that you listen to each podcast wherever you get your podcasts (or catch up below, prior to the full day event).

Programme

We have now finalised our Ko Papa Ko Rangi programme. Please explore the full programme now, with some extraordinary keynotes and panelists and, of course, you!

Four-Part Podcast Series: Pre-Symposium Listening!

As well as right here, you’ll find these podcasts wherever you get your podcasts! Be sure to subscribe for further content to be released down the track.

Podcast 1 | Ko Papa Ko Rangi, with Ruia Aperahama, Māni Dunlop and Alex Keeble

Listen here:

The first podcast in our rolling symposium is a conversation with the Pou Tikanga of the Deep South Challenge Ruia Aperahama, journalist Māni Dunlop and Deep South Challenge engagement team member Alex Keeble, exploring the symposium’s name.

Within mātauranga Māori, the concept of “utu” suggests that if something is taken, permission must first be requested. Once taken, something of equal or greater value must be returned. Further obligations are in this way generated, and a relationship becomes reciprocal. In the pūrākau of Papa and Rangi, for choosing to separate his parents, Tāne repays them over and again, with his heart forever to Papa and his feet always striving for Rangi – an expression of ever growing love. With this image, we see Tāne as upside down. But perhaps it is we who are the wrong way up? Are we capable of making decisions that return to Papa and Rangi value greater than what we have taken?

Portrait of Ruia Aperahama

Ruia Aperahama

Ruia (Ngāti Pikiahu, Ngāti Waewae, Ngāti Tūtemohuta, Tūrangitūkua, Ngāti Kurī, Te Aupouri, Pohutiare, Ngāti Kahu, Muriwhenua, Ngāti Whātua) is an award-winning singer, songwriter, visual artist and illustrator, respected for his knowledge of Tikanga and Te Reo Māori. Ruia is also the Pou Tikanga for the Deep South Challenge.

Māni Dunlop

Māni Dunlop, he uri o Ngāpuhi, has been a journalist and news presenter with RNZ for more than a decade. In 2020 she was made the first Māori presenter for a weekday programme on RNZ, for Midday Report, te Pūrongo o te Poutūtanga. She is the co-chair of Kawea te Rongo, the Māori Journalists Association, and often features at conferences and other events as a speaker on panels, or as MC and facilitator.

Portrait of Alex Keeble

Alex Keeble

Alex (Pākehā) supports our Engagement Team to plan and create meaningful, whānau-friendly communications and engagement projects. Her approach to communicating about climate change and climate adaptation is informed both by research and by many years trialling tools and tactics at the flaxroots.

Podcast 2 | Ka mua ka muri, with Shaun Awatere, Jen Margaret and Māni Dunlop

Listen here:

To understand the paradigm within which we consider concepts of value, cost and risk, we need to grapple with our past and reconsider our present. In this second podcast, senior economist Shaun Awatere and Te Tiriti educator Jen Margaret look backwards and forwards, exploring how our economy and economic frameworks have evolved and been impacted by past decision-making, and what this could mean for our future with a changing climate.

Shaun Awatere (Ngāti Porou)

Shaun is a senior kairangahau with Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, holds the Climate Pou with Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga, and is on our Kāhui Māori. In his work, Shaun incorporates Māori values into economic decision-making for collective assets, enabling Māori organisations to make kaupapa Māori attuned decisions. He is currently engaged in research and policy to help prepare iwi and hapū for climate change mitigation and adaptation planning.

Jen Margaret (Pākehā, of Cornish, Scottish, Danish & German descent)

Jen Margaret is a dedicated advocate and educator for Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and is the founder of Groundwork. A recipient of Winston Churchill and Loxley Fellowships, Jen has researched the work of non-indigenous allies in North America, Australia and Aotearoa. She is driven by the question posed by her mentor Mitzi Nairn, “How might we be the honourable people rangatira thought they were entering into relationship with in 1840?”

Podcast 3 | Insurance for adaptation, with Ronji Tanielu, Carolyn Kousky, Belinda Storey and Kate Turner

Listen here:

How do we currently price, pay for and transfer “climate risk”? Are these methods reducing danger or delaying what we do about it? Insurance only works when you can afford it; who will be (or is being?) most harmed if we don’t support different ways of protecting ourselves and our communities? This third podcast, with experts from within and outside of the insurance industry, interrogate the role of insurance now, and what it might need to play an effective and equitable role in climate adaptation.

Ronji Tanielu

Ronji is the principal policy advisor for the Social Policy and Parliamentary Unit of The Salvation Army, based in South Auckland. He is a committed Christian who works in advocacy and policy around housing, justice reform, addictions treatment, financial hardship, welfare reform, youth, and children. His approach is to be positively disruptive to advocate for change to government, corporations, and other agencies focused on meeting the needs of the people served by The Salvation Army.

Carolyn Kousky

Carolyn is Associate Vice President for Economics and Policy at Environmental Defense Fund in the United States. Dr. Kousky’s research examines multiple aspects of climate risk management and policy approaches for increasing resilience. She has published numerous articles, reports, and book chapters on the economics and policy of climate risk and disaster finance. She is a co-editor of A Blueprint for Coastal Adaptation and author of Understanding Disaster Insurance: New Tools for a More Resilient Future. Dr. Kousky has worked with many communities on resilience strategies and developing inclusive models for insurance and disaster recovery.

Portrait of Belinda Storey

Belinda Storey

Belinda’s research centres on climate change risk. Her work focuses on the impact of escalating hazards on property prices and insurance availability, and the development of a new model for valuing property under climate change called “climate leases”. Belinda is Managing Director of both Climate Sigma, which conducts scenario analysis and asset valuation under climate change, and the Whakahura: Extreme Events and the Emergence of Climate Change research programme.

Portrait of Kate Turner

Kate Turner

Kate’s role, as the Challenge’s Climate Change Knowledge Broker, is to support researchers and stakeholders to navigate the often disaggregated world of climate change data, information and people. Kate is a Fulbright scholar from Ōtepoti (Dunedin) with a background in sea ice physics, and has spent time working with local knowledge holders on the ice in Alaska, investigating the extreme changes underway in their sea ice environment. She is motivated by science as a service to our communities and society, and how scientific tools and information can be mobilised for change.

Podcast 4 | Framing the costs of climate change, with Sacha McMeeking, Anita Wreford, Jodie Kuntzsch and Kate Turner

Listen here:

Everyone, from homeowners to policy makers, from marae committees to corporations, is asking, “How much will climate change cost us, and how much will it cost to adapt?” But are these the best questions? 

Do we risk embedding an unbalanced future, because we’re struggling to step back and consider the full extent of what’s at stake? What would effective adaptation actually look and feel like?

This fourth and final podcast, with key thinkers in the space,  examines what we know about “costing climate change”, what we don’t know, and how we can inspire momentum for change throughout our government, businesses and communities.

Sacha McMeeking

Sacha brings a serial entrepreneur’s approach to working with and for Iwi Māori. From instigating United Nations proceedings to architecting a Māori social enterprise fund and leading commercial negotiations, she is known for solution-building that meets Iwi Māori aspirations. Recognised as an emerging New Zealand leader, Sacha won the inaugural Fulbright Harkness Fellowship in 2010. Sacha is a change agent and compliments her varied background with a desire to support and grow the next generation of Māori scholars. 

Portrait of Anita Wreford

Anita Wreford

Anita Wreford, Lincoln University, is an economist and the leader of our Impacts & Implications programme. She’s experienced across many areas of climate change, including economic evaluations of adaptation; community resilience to extreme weather events; and adaptation decision-making among various stakeholders.

Jodie Kuntzsch

Jodie is dedicated to the adaptation and creation of a blue economy for Aotearoa, and has led collaborative projects from across the global seafood industry. Her career has focused on bringing together stakeholders to develop economically viable solutions to the sector’s urgent environmental, social and climate related challenges. Her work spans four continents and hundreds of marine farms, fishing vessels, seafood factories and businesses.

Portrait of Kate Turner

Kate Turner

Kate’s role, as the Challenge’s Climate Change Knowledge Broker, is to support researchers and stakeholders to navigate the often disaggregated world of climate change data, information and people. Kate is a Fulbright scholar from Ōtepoti (Dunedin) with a background in sea ice physics, and has spent time working with local knowledge holders on the ice in Alaska, investigating the extreme changes underway in their sea ice environment. She is motivated by science as a service to our communities and society, and how scientific tools and information can be mobilised for change.

Full-day symposium

Registrations are fully booked out. (We will be releasing videos of our keynotes and panels after the event, via our YouTube channel).

9-9.30am | Registrations, Tea & coffee, Sponsor a seedling

As a small gesture towards reciprocity, we’ll be inviting all participants to sponsor native seeds or a native tree. We’ll facilitate this on the day.

9.30-9.45am | Welcome and whakatūwhera

With our host for the day, Māni Dunlop

9.45-10am | Keynote: How is our current economic pathway creating our climate future?

We’ve invited a very special and internationally renowned guest to speak to the challenges ahead of us, whether we change our change our thinking or not, but especially if we do not.

Koko Warner

Koko Warner is a climate change expert who specialises in human migration and displacement. She has worked in the United Nations for over 16 years, directing research on climate change and migration, and climate risk management, before joining the secretariat to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to supervise the climate impacts, vulnerabilities and risk policy workstreams in its adaptation division. Koko is currently leading UN work to implement the IOM Migration Data Strategy 2020–25 by bringing together IOM’s data expertise on data collection, analysis and sharing; migration data governance; and forecasting, among others. 

Koko has contributed to understanding, managing, and informing policy about adverse climate impacts, climate change and migration, and loss and damage. Koko holds a PhD in economics from the University of Vienna and in 2014, was named by the International Council for Science as one of the top 20 women making contributions to climate change debate.

10-11.10am | Panel: A wider lens: How do we conceptualise the costs of climate change?

We know that work is getting underway across Aotearoa to quantify the costs of climate change, including the costs of adaptation or of failure to adapt. But how do we understand “cost”? Does it encompass the fullness of our environmental, human, social, cultural (and financial) worlds that are central to our experiences of and response to this crisis. Can our current economic thinking really lead to effective climate adaptation? If we can’t or don’t consider some costs, how can we ensure these are factored in our adaptation decisions?

Kiri Dell (Ngāti Porou)

Dr Kiri Dell is a Senior Lecturer in the Business School at the University of Auckland. She is a Ngāti Porou woman living in her tribal territory of Ruatōria. Her main passion is working with whānau and activating their aspirations for whenua Māori. She holds various director, trustee and board roles across a number of organisations, and is a chair of the Indigenous Caucus of the Academy of Management. She has a lively and large whānau, which enables her to play the many roles of mum, aunty, daughter, sister, cousin and niece.

Ilan Noy

Ilan has been the Chair in the Economics of Disasters and Climate Change at Victoria University of Wellington since 2013. His focus is on the economic aspects of natural hazards, disasters, and climate change, and other related topics in environmental, development, and international economics. He is also the founding Editor-in-Chief of the journal Economics of Disasters and Climate Change. He has consulted for the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, UNDRR, the IMF and ASEAN. 

Mark Baker-Jones (Ngāpuhi, Ngāruahine)

Mark is a world-leader in climate change regulatory and policy risk, and Kaitohutohu Panoni Āhuarangi (Climate Advisor) with Te Whakahaere. Mark was political advisor to the Climate Change Minister during the development of NZ’s climate change legislative regime. Mark has held senior legal roles in some of the world’s most prestigious law firms, and has published widely on climate legal risk. He has unique insights into climate change legal risk, policy and regulation, particularly for the financial sector.

11.10-11.30am | Morning tea

Enjoy a light kai and return to your tables for our workshop session.

11.30am-12.45pm | Workshop: The experts are as lost as the rest of us!

A workshop to support you to uncover the drivers for and barriers to climate adaptive approaches, and brainstorming creative solutions.

12.45-1pm | Transition risk!

Our host Māni Dunlop will help you transition from workshop to lunch, energised enough to return with focus for our afternoon session.

1-2pm | Lunch

Earth-friendly kai from some of our best local producers.

2-3.10pm | Panel: Funding and financing the future

In the end, how can we overcome the current barriers to investment in and funding for climate adaptation? If we consider that the “costs” of climate change include environmental, human, social, cultural and financial costs, what innovative solutions are, or could be in play to respond equitably and effectively to this crisis? In this panel, we bring together possibilities and provocations that interrogate government policy levers, alternative business strategies, and private sector mobilisation.

Riria te Kanawa

Riria is a partner at KPMG, whose work focuses on simplifying the complex so clients are better placed to make clear, focused and guiding strategic choices, map the pathway to achievement, and most importantly, execute. In a world of constant change, Riria helps clients to challenge their own status-quo and bring a customer- rather than a process-centric lens to their work. Riria is passionate about working with Māori, considering how business approaches and measures of success can better reflect our Māori worldview as we pursue the perfect balance between people, planet and pūtea.

John Reid (Ngai Tahu)

John leads research programmes attempting to solve complex socioeconomic problems by utilising systems thinking and indigenous wisdom traditions. He has a particular interest in relationships between human and non-human beings and the role of appropriate technologies and insight in generating symbiosis between them. Currently, John leads national research programmes that bring together science, industry, and indigenous communities to address sustainability challenges related to New Zealand’s oceans, freshwater, land and biodiversity.

Jo Kelly

Jo is Chief Executive of Toitū Tahua, the Centre for Sustainable Finance. Jo has delivered cross-continent sustainability initiatives between some of the world’s best known business leaders. Jo is also on the B Lab Australia New Zealand Board and the National Advisory Board for Impact Investing. In 2011 Jo managed establishment of The B Team, which led the first calls from business for Net Zero by 2050 and an ambitious Paris Agreement. On returning home to Aotearoa NZ Jo spent four years with Deloitte New Zealand. Jo is of Ngati Tuwharetoa, Scottish and Finnish descent.

David Hall

Dr David Hall is Climate Policy Director at Toha with expertise in climate action, land use change, sustainable finance and just transitions. He has a DPhil in Politics from the University of Oxford and has additional roles as Adjunct Lecturer at AUT University’s School of Social Sciences & Public Policy, member of the Forestry Ministerial Advisory Group, Contributing Author to IPCC AR6 WG2, and Principal Investigator for AUT’s Living Laboratories Programme of nature-based solutions. Previously he has worked with a diverse range of public and private sector stakeholders on climate innovation and publishes widely in a range of academic and public-facing media, which includes the 2022 report, Adaptation Finance: Risks and Opportunities for Aotearoa New Zealand.

3.10-3.40pm | Afternoon tea

Enjoy a pick-me-up before our final keynote and brainstorming sesion.

3.40-4pm | Keynote: Sounds great, but can any of these ideas really work?

Firebrand finance journalist Shamubeel Eaqub will speak off the cuff, attempting to draw in the threads, expose them to the sun and the wind, and provide his perspective on the arguments and ideas of the day.

Shamubeel Eaqub

Shamubeel is an experienced economist who makes economics easy. He is a thought leader unafraid to take a contrarian view. An engaging and knowledgeable speaker, Shamubeel is a regular and respected contributor to media, government and business sector discussions on economic and strategic matters. He holds a BCOM with honours in Economics from Lincoln University and is also a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA). Shamubeel has authored Growing Apart: Regional Prosperity in New Zealand, and co-authored Generation Rent and The New Zealand Economy: An Introduction.

4-4.45pm | Reflections

A brainstorming session to ensure we have captured questions that haven’t been answered, gaps in knowledge and research, contradictions and paradoxes, and to explore some practical options for change in your every day work.

4.45-5pm | Closing

We come back together to close the day and set intentions for the future.

5pm onwards | Refreshments at Te Papa

We invite you to enjoy refreshments and some more casual kōrero, to wind down for the weekend after an epic and hopefully inspiring day.

Submission to Te Ara Paerangi Future Pathways Green Paper (2022)

Rush hour traffic in Auckland City

This submission is based on the Deep South Challenge: Changing with our Climate experience of funding and delivering expert climate modelling and adaptation research and science. This submission sits alongside the submission by the Vision Mātauranga Engagement Team, Deep South
Challenge: Changing with our Climate to Te Ara Paerangi Future Pathways green paper. We have not commented on other views on the science structure in Aotearoa NZ.

At the onset of the Deep South Challenge, we developed a clear vision, mission, objectives, and research strategy. A large amount of research is needed to prepare Aotearoa for the climate change that is locked in, as well as those impacts which are still uncertain. We invested resource in developing relationships across research institutions, with a strong focus on encouraging interdisciplinary and inter-institution project teams, to reduce silos and competition and increase collaboration for the public good. We also established a standalone engagement research programme, a move which triggered innovation in engagement approaches across the National
Science Challenges. It was important for us to prioritise research (and be clear on what research not to prioritise) given the limited sum of funding in the Challenge.

It took around two years for the Challenge to do this initial work. Currently, two years before the Challenge ends, we are about to finish distributing funds to give enough time for new research projects to be completed and results communicated or engaged with. Important areas such as climate adaptation (and mitigation) need continuity of funding that does not change the funding arrangements and/or institutions every 5 to 10 years.

Nevertheless, the smaller time horizon for the Challenge has encouraged innovation and collaboration in both research and methods for commissioning research.

We found the separation of funding from delivery of research was important. Independent National Science Challenges can assess which organisations can deliver the research required to achieve respective missions. Governance by an independent board also allows for objective investment across appropriate institutions. Contracting with clear deliverables and milestones has meant that we have had good oversight of spending public funding.

We agree that there is “persistent uncertainty about the value of investments” and a recent effort to understand where climate change research funding was being directed (via investment landscape mapping) made it clear that many research institutions and government departments do not keep this information. Furthermore, of the funding information we were able to collate, only $22m of $329m from 2010 to present was invested in projects by Māori, for Māori, quantifying the lack of equity in this aspect of the science system.

Future Crown research funding should not be viewed in a piecemeal way. Other funding, such as the Performance Based Research Fund should also be considered when looking at the future RSI system.

A full copy of our submission can be viewed here.

Calling for a new Director

We sadly farewell our Director, Mike Williams, who has just been appointed to the role of Chief Scientist, Oceans, at NIWA.

We’re now on the lookout for someone with proven experience in multi-disciplinary research, science management and governance to lead our Challenge for the next three years.

Mike started with the Challenge in 2014 as a Programme Leader, before taking on the role of Director in August 2016. He has seen us through a period of significant development, especially as the national conversation around climate adaptation has taken root.

When he first took on the role, Mike says the debate was dominated by mitigation and that “not enough people were thinking about how to cope with climate change that is already locked in.” His strong support for our multidisciplinary Challenge Leadership Team has helped turn the dial towards preparing for inevitable climate impacts.

We wish Mike all the best for his new role at NIWA, he will be missed.

Mike’s departure creates an exciting opportunity for an experienced science manager, administrator and communicator to help us fulfil our mission of ensuring that New Zealanders can adapt, manage risk and thrive in a changing climate. Bring your knowledge of science, your passion for people-centred climate adaptation, and your understanding of iwi and hapū aspirations to the table. Here, you can play a pivotal role championing the adaptation aspirations of our communities.

We’re looking for someone with good relationships in te ao Māori and with a strong background in climate policy and/or science.

In your role, you’ll help incorporate new practices that connect iwi/hapū, industry, regulators, planners and policy-makers to ensure our nation is ready for the climate changes ahead of us.

Tono mai / apply here at: https://www.seek.co.nz/job/53915539?type=standout#searchRequestToken=36e03e91-c595-4b85-a97f-fa5b81ccc8be

Getting hot, hot, hot – climate modelling explained

Scientists are now predicting higher temperatures with more certainty, so what’s changed? One of New Zealand’s leading climate modellers, Dr Olaf Morgenstern, helps demystify the science behind the latest climate projections

By now, you might be familiar with the major insights from the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, collating developments in climate science over the last 8 years. 

It paints a clearer, albeit more terrifying, picture of how the earth’s atmosphere, oceans and land have changed since pre-industrial times. 

The world’s leading climate scientists, representing every region on the planet, have then simulated five different scenarios up to the end of this century. 

The 2015 Paris agreement set the target for avoiding catastrophic climate change and ecological disaster at below 2 degrees, striving for 1.5 degrees. Six years later and the prospects have significantly diminished. 

“We are likely going to cross that 1.5 degree threshold even in the most optimistic of these scenarios,” the Deep South Challenge’s Earth System Modelling and Prediction programme lead, Dr Olaf Morgenstern says.

The IPCC report is clear that “rapid, deep and sustained cuts to emissions” are needed to keep the global temperature anywhere near these targets. It’s only in “the most optimistic scenario” Morgenstern says, where there is cooling after 2050 by removing more CO2 from the atmosphere than we add, that global warming could reach less than 1.5 degrees by the end of this century. 

Whether we’ll have the technological capability to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, or whether polluters are prepared to change their ways, will be the focus of Mitigation of Climate Change, set to be published in 2022. It’s clear the current targets put forward by different nations won’t be enough to meet the 2 degree target. The upcoming “Conference of the Parties”, scheduled for November in Glasgow, will reveal whether countries are prepared to rise to the challenge.

This report focuses on the physical science of climate change – a complex task using some of the largest supercomputers in the world to generate simulations of our future climate. The amount of data produced for the report is much larger than what was generated for the previous IPCC report (5th Assessment), Morgenstern says, who was one of 13 lead authors of Chapter 3, Human Influence on the Climate System.

Simulating our future climate requires some of the largest supercomputers in the world, as NIWA scientist Dr Jonny Williams explains

Questions have been raised about whether the latest climate models are “running hot”. A standard experiment in climate modelling involves doubling the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and waiting until the Earth system has settled into a new balance, or “equilibrium”. Calculating the average warming since the pre-industrial age is then the “equilibrium climate sensitivity” of the model. This single number is a simple way to characterise climate models.

It takes hundreds to thousands of years for all temperature-influencing processes to come to balance, E.G for atmospheric warming to permeate into the depths of the ocean, so the climate sensitivity is calculated only once the system has settled into a new balance or “equilibrium”.

It is true that several of the most recent climate models are “running hotter” than others before them. But the IPCC assessment doesn’t rely solely on these models for its assessment of climate sensitivity. Rather, other insights are used, such as understanding the average global surface temperature during past periods of the Earth’s history. 

By combining these insights, the assessed climate sensitivity uncertainty has in fact halved. The best estimate of climate sensitivity, calculated in the report, is 3 degrees; this is unchanged from previous IPCC reports. However, scientists have reduced the error estimates around this number. For the first time, this improved understanding of climate sensitivity is used to assess end-of-century warming. 

Scientists use an amalgamation of climate models to measure the changes in the atmosphere, land and ocean. For large-scale climate features – temperature, precipitation, radiation – the report finds climate models today perform better than those of previous generations. But while there have been “incremental improvements” in climate modelling, there are still areas where more research is needed. 

Climate models don’t accurately capture what is happening here in Aotearoa. Our maritime climate is largely influenced by what’s happening in the surrounding ocean. The clean air over the Southern Ocean is creating an “error” in simulations as scientists seek to understand how aerosols interact with the clouds.  

Then there’s the small observed increase in Antarctic sea ice extent over several decades which in recent years has given way to an abrupt decrease. This complex behaviour isn’t generally captured in climate models. Understanding these unique features of our Pacific climate is at the heart of New Zealand Earth System Model (NZESM), a model being developed by Dr Olaf Morgenstern and his team. This is being developed in collaboration with the UK MetOffice. Without their support, the Deep South Challenge wouldn’t be able to undertake such a mammoth task. 

He Karanga: Research funding for Māori

A message from the Kāhui Māori of the Deep South Challenge 

We recognise the deep knowledge, skills and experience that Māori communities possess to adapt to the changes occurring within our environment and communities as a result of climate change. 

Historical experience has proven that upholding mātauranga and tikanga Māori, while embracing the benefits of other knowledge systems, allows us to reinterpret, adapt and strengthen ourselves in a world that is forever in motion. 

The Kāhui wishes to keep these fires burning. We have a responsibility and an obligation to Ahi kā, Ahi tere, Ahi taitai, Ahi tahutahu, Ahi whakaene, Ahi kōmau, Ahi hinu, Ahi Kōpae, Ahi kāroa. We want to support the work Māori are already undertaking not just to survive, but to flourish and thrive against a background of broader social and global changes. 

With the release of our two new funding initiatives, Te Aho and Te Taura (totalling $1.45M), our goal is to support organic, creative, innovative and Māori responses to the impacts of climate change. These initiatives have been developed in recognition of the diversity of experience, knowledge and responses to climate change across and within ngā iwi and hāpori Māori.

Please note: Both our funding rounds have now closed. Please see below for key dates.

Funding process

Both Te Aho and Te Taura will follow a two-step process: 

Step 1: You submit your research idea as an “Expression of Interest” (don’t wait until the deadline! Submit early so we can get in touch if we have questions)

Step 2: An invitation to provide a full proposal through a Request for Proposal (you’ll be invited if your idea is within our scope)

About this funding 

Click on the questions below for some quick fire answers to common pātai:

What kinds of climate adaptation research projects are you looking for?

We’re looking for projects that support mātauranga and rangatiratanga in relation to our changing climate. We also encourage projects that will help you to understand, assess and respond to climate risks that are important/relevant to you. Please have a look at these Kaupapa Rangahau: potential focus areas. We encourage research that speaks to these gaps, but we don’t want you to feel limited by these ideas. If you have an idea about climate adaptation research, please submit an Expression of Interest.

You can download and print these research priorities here:

MĀTAURANGA
Mātauranga and our changing climate
Drawing on mātauranga to activate, grow and pass on climate knowledges
Te Reo Māori and climate change
Language revitalisation in the context of climate change
Resilience and well-being
Community cohesion, identity, attachment, wairua and well-being in the face of future displacement, trauma and urbanisation. An ethic of restoration for future generations.
Tikanga for planning and decision making
Mana, kawa, tikanga, ritenga
RANGATIRATANGA
Te Tiriti o Waitangi
Te Tiriti implications and Tikanga Māori in relation to managed retreat (Including: national fund for managed retreat, and the proposed Natural and Built Environments Act, Strategic Planning Act and Climate Change Adaptation Act)
Tino Rangatiratanga: Leadership and autonomy
Governance for climate adaptation
Constitutional transformation in the context of climate change
He Atua
Legal personhood for atua and tūpuna Māori in the context of climate change: Could a “law of Ranginui, Papatūānuku and Tangaroa/Hinemoana” support climate action and adaptation in Aotearoa?
Decolonising climate action and adaptation
Indigenising policy and action; Mana wāhine and climate policy and action; Supporting rangatahi to advocate for Māori rights & responsibilities
He kai kei aku ringa
Food security and food sovereignty in relation to future climate crisis and future land-use changes likely under climate change
Local government: Barriers and opportunities
Research that identifies effective strategies and responses to support iwi and hapū to be self-determining adapting to climate change, within (or in spite of) existing local government legislative infrastructure
UNDERSTANDING RISK
Ecosystem impacts and restoration
Impacts on and restoration of our ecosystems (terrestrial, freshwater and coastal-marine domains) and taonga species
The Māori economy
The Māori economy is heavily dependent on the natural environment. How exposed is it to climate change? How can pākihi Māori, hapū/iwi trusts, Māori entrepreneurs, artists, and weavers etc, adapt? 
Financial risks for the Māori economy
Implications for Māori agents such as Māori holding corporations, pākihi Māori, hapū/iwi trusts and incorporations of the Financial Sector (Climate-related Disclosure and Other Matters) Act
Cultural heritage
Risks to marae, wāhi tapu, wāhi tīpuna and other cultural heritage due to ongoing sea-level rise, extreme weather events and wildfire
The built environment
Assessing and addressing risk to infrastructure important to Māori including: drinking water supplies; wastewater and stormwater systems; transport networks; emergency management systems 
Just transitions
Principles and policy behind a just transition from a Māori perspective: understanding & supporting Māori to shift from carbon-intensive industries; understanding & supporting Māori landowners to reduce or eliminate carbon emissions

Why are you releasing two different funds? What’s the difference between Te Taura and Te Aho?

Whānau, hapū and iwi have told us clearly that climate research funding needs to support communities who are taking action now to protect themselves against climate change.

Our Te Aho fund aims to support action research (hands-on, on the ground research). Te Aho funds don’t require you to be affiliated to a university, Crown Research Institute, or other research organisations. Te Taura research funding is targeted towards larger research collaborations between communities and research organisations.

Te Taura has a focus on impact at a larger scale: regionally or nationally.  Please take a look at this Te Aho and Te Taura table to get a sense of the similarities and the differences between our two funding streams:

How will you decide which projects are successful in getting funded?

The assessment criteria for Te Aho and Te Taura are listed in this document. They are quite different from previous assessment criteria we have used before. We are trying to do things differently, in order to support whānau, hapū and iwi to achieve their own research aspirations. Have a look at the assessment criteria and if you are unsure about what they might mean for you and your project, please get in touch.

How will we “report” on our research? Can we report using mātauranga Māori methods?

Yes! We strongly encourage research that generates and transmits knowledge within te ao Māori. This means you don’t necessarily need to write an English-language research report or journal article, unless you identify that this will have an impact for your community. You can report on your research in oral and physical ways, and you can also report in/on your own whenua. Whatever your research outputs might be, they should be designed to meet the needs of your community. See this Te Aho and Te Taura table for more information about reporting.

What will the Request for Proposal (RfP) involve?

If your research idea is within scope, we will invite you to submit a full research proposal. This will be a more in-depth submission and will encourage your team to think through your research methods and to articulate your research outputs in concrete terms.

What questions are in the EOI application form?

  • Your email
Tēnā whakamāramatia mai, nō hea koutou, ko wai koutou?
  • Your name
  • Your hapū / iwi
  • Your phone number
  • Your hāpori / rōpu / institution / organisation
  • What fund are you applying for?
  • Key members of your rōpū or research team We’re interested in the range of skills, experience and knowledges you might activate. Limit 100 words.
  • Which community do you intend will benefit most from this research? For example, the name of the marae, papakāinga, hāpori, hapū or iwi where your research will be grounded. If your research is regional or national in focus, please give details.
  • What is your main kaupapa, in relation to this climate research funding round? In later questions, you’ll have an opportunity to describe your project in more detail. Here, please provide a short summary or high-level perspective of your main kaupapa.
  • Does this kaupapa speak to one or more of the focus areas and priorities? Please see our guidelines for more information. If it doesn’t, we’d still like to hear from you.
Diving deeper: Gathering information about your proposed research
  • What are your (or your community’s) moemoeā or aspirations in relation to this research? We are interested in how your research might support climate resilience, wellbeing, and community or national transformation. Limit 200 words.
  • What are your potential research goals and potential outcomes? Please number these goals/outcomes (and provide anywhere from 1 to 3 or 4 goals). Limit 200 words.
  • In relation to your research goals, which of the following statements best describes your team or rōpū?
    • We’re feeling confident with our proposed research and will be ready to submit an RFP if/when invited
    • We’re reasonably confident with our proposed research, but still need to work through some of the details
    • We’re still working through our potential research goals
    • We’re just at the conceptualisation phase
    • Other
  • Please describe how mātauranga Māori might be activated through your research. If your project may also use or blend other science methods, please give details. What steps will be involved in undertaking and completing your project. Limit 200 words.
  • Indicative budget

He aha ngā pātai i roto i te <strong>kīanga puaki whitawhita</strong>?

  • Tō īmēra
Tēnā whakamāramatia mai, nō hea koutou, ko wai mā koutou?
  • Tōu ingoa
  • Tō hapū / iwi
  • Tō nama waea
  • Tō hapori / rōpū / whare mahi / ohu mahi
  • Ko tēhea pūtea e tonoa nei?
  • Ngā mema pū o tō ohu o tō rōpū rangahau rānei E ngana nei kia mohio ake he aha rā ngā pūkenga, whēako me ngā mātauranga tērā e hihiko ai. Kia 100 pū ngā kupu whakautu.
  • Ko tēhea hapori ka whiwhi hua rawa i tēnei rangahau? Arā, te ingoa marae, papakāinga, hapori, hapū, iwi rānei kei reira nei tō rangahau e tau ana. Mehemea he aronga rangahau whānui ā rohe, whānui ā motu rānei; tēnā koa whākina mai ōna taipitopito.
  • He aha nei tō kaupapa matua e whaipānga ana ki te wātaka pūtea rangahau panoni āhuarangi nei? Taihoa iho kei ngā uiui e whiwhi wā ai koe ki te tuhi whakaahua mai i tō kaupapa kia taipitopito ake. Tēnā mai koa he whakarāpopototanga, he tuhinga kounga whakataurite mō tō kaupapa matua.
  • Whai tikanga tonu te kaupapa nei ki tētahi, ētahi rānei o ngā aronga matua? Tirohia ngā ara tohutohu mō ngā whakamārama. Ki te kore e whai tikanga, nei ka hiahia kia rongo tonu atu i a koe
Ruku hōhonu: Kohikohi whakamārama e pā ana ki tāu tūtohi rangahau
  • He aha nei ō moemoeā, ngā wawata me ngā manako rānei o tō hapori e pā ana ki tēnei rangahau? E ngana nei kia mōhio ake pēhea rā te tautoko a tō rangahau kia toitū tonu ai te āhuarangi,  te hauora, te whakawhanake ā hapori ā motu rānei. Kia 200 kupu pū hei whakautu.
  • He aha nei ngā whāinga pito mata a tō rangahau me ngā hua ka puta? Tohua kia tatauria mai ngā whāinga/putanga (kia 1 ki te 3 ki te 4 rānei whāinga) kia 200 kupu pū hei whakautu.
  • I te whaipānga o ngā whāinga rangahau, ko tēhea o ēnei rerenga kupu e hāngai nei hei whakaahua i tō ohu, tō rōpū rānei:
    • E  tino māia nei mātou ki tā mātou tūtohi rangahau otirā tērā e rite mō te tuku tono pūtea rangahau inā karangatia.
    • E āhua māia nei mātou ki tā mātou tūtohi rangahau, engari me whakarite tonu ake i ētahi taipitopito.
    • E whakatau tonu ana mātou i ō mātou whāinga rangahau pito mata.
    • E whakahuatau tonu ana mātou.
    • Arā noa atu.
  • Me kupu whakaahua mai i te pēheatanga o te matāuranga māori e hihiko ai i tō rangahau. Mēnā he ritenga pūtaiao kē hei whenumi mai, whākina mai. Mēnā e pūrangiaho ana tō tukanga rangahau ki a koe, tēnā tukua mai ngā whakamārama whānui tonu. Kia 200 kupu pū.
  • Tahua tūtohu

Can I download the EoI form as a Word document?

Yes, you can download these forms in Word. However, we strongly encourage you to submit your answers using GoogleForm (below).

More FAQs (these are updated weekly!)

Do we have to partner with a mainstream institution to apply for Te Taura?

No! Not at all. It may be more likely that Te Taura applications involve relationships or collaborations with either universities or CRIs. However, it’s by no means a criteria for Te Taura applications. We want to encourage research collaborations that are meaningful and that support kaupapa Māori research and the vision you have for your rangahau.

Can we apply for both Te Aho and Te Taura? Can we submit multiple EoIs?

Yes, we’re happy for you to submit multiple EoIs. And yes, we’re happy for you to apply to both research funds. In both cases, please take the process seriously and think carefully about your kaupapa, your capacity and your research goals. Please submit your best applications, so we get a real sense of your priorities and your readiness to undertake research. We also strongly encourage members of the same iwi to work together. Multiple applications from members of the same iwi on the same kaupapa will be difficult for us to assess.

Can Councils apply for this funding, in partnership with iwi?

Strictly speaking, no. This funding is for kaupapa Māori research that is by Māori and for the benefit of Māori communities. However, if iwi want to pursue research that involves or requires Council input (such as research, engagement, data provision, etc.), these kinds of projects are definitely “in-scope”. We would hope that Councils provide in-kind funding, for example through staff resource. We won’t fund roles or contributions to projects where these are already funded as part of the everyday business of Councils.

How will the total pool of funding be allocated? Will it be equitably shared across the motu?

The Challenge’s final decisions will depend on the range and nature of all the project ideas that are submitted. We have limited funding. We may choose to fund across different geographic areas. Or, if there is a strong case that research in only a few rohe is likely to bring significant benefits nationally, we might invest in only a few geographic areas. Regardless, we encourage you to submit your best research ideas.

Are the project start and end dates strict? 

The end dates for these projects are strict, yes. The Deep South Challenge is only funded until June 2024. All research projects must be finished by February 2024, in order to ensure we can do the best post-project engagement possible. The long timeframes for assessing and contracting projects reflect our experience in how long it can take to contract with multiple partners, and also take into account delays in research. But these timeframes are not targets – if there are no problems with contracting, projects can begin as soon as they are ready. 

Do I need to know the exact cost of the project for the EoI?

For the EoI we only ask you to give us an indication of the total project cost. The full breakdown and detail of the project budgets will be worked through in the full RfP and we will provide you with detailed guidance notes to support you to create a detailed budget that meets the needs of your project. 

Is there a minimum time-frame for projects? 

A key part of our funding decisions will be ensuring that the timeline and budget you propose is suitable for the scope and nature of the project. We would expect projects to take anywhere between six to 18 months, but we will provide more detailed guidance during the RfP process. 

Can we get funding to create a final product, like a book, a handbook, a documentary or a board game? 

Our research funding supports knowledge gathering and knowledge generation. A product, such as a book, may well be a vital output from the research, and a natural response to your research findings. You can allocate some of your budget to supporting these kinds of outputs. We want your research to be useful and usable, both for your own community and for other communities. Please do keep in mind, however, that the research itself is the main game.

Can non-Māori researchers apply?

As this funding is for the benefit of Māori communities, we expect Māori research teams and/or Māori communities to be leading and driving research projects. Some teams may include Pākehā or tauiwi researchers who bring specific expertise, but this fund is to support research that is by Māori, for Māori.

We would like some specific expertise/science input into our project, but we’re not sure who to approach, can you help?

In developing your EoI you can identify areas where you might want some external support or a specific set of skills. We may be able to help connect you with scientists or other expertise to help you with your project.

Are scholarships available?

We encourage projects to consider the opportunities for growing the next generation of researchers. There is scholarship funding available and we will discuss the process for distribution of scholarships with project teams. At this stage, please indicate on your EoI if you have a potential scholarship student within your project, or would like to support one. 

Kaupapa specific: Will you fund projects that focus on…
  • Climate adaptation strategies
  • Pest control
  • Health
  • Our marine area

All these projects are in scope, but the focus of the activities must have research and climate change at the centre of the project. By “research,” we are referring to the processes of knowledge/mātauranga creation, application and/or transmission. In terms of climate change, we are taking a broad approach, i.e. climate justice, resilience relationality with te taiao. That could include kaupapa that are not specifically ‘climate focused’ but are important interventions to climate impacts. As above, the output (such as a climate change strategy) is a response to the research findings, rather than the primary focus itself.

How important is it for us to partner or collaborate with other groups or organisations? Is the kāhui able to suggest or recommend potential partners (and/or make introductions) if we don’t already have any?

There is no requirement to partner with anyone else, but for many projects it will make sense to work collaboratively, or to utilise/access data or expertise that is held with others (for example, local or regional councils). If you don’t already have research partners lined up, but have an idea of what your needs might be, we may be able to identify potential researchers or existing data that could support your project. Please ask if so! It will depend on your kaupapa, so we encourage you to get in touch with our engagement team early.

Is specific climate language required in the EOI?

E Kao! The first part of this process should feel like a conversation or dialogue, so we encourage plain language applications that get to the heart of your project – i.e. why the research/rangahau is needed, what the project will involve, and how it will benefit or impact the community or people you are working with/on behalf of. You do need to demonstrate that your project is responding to a need/gap/opportunity in relation to the causes or impacts of climate change (in fact, this is key to presenting a strong proposal). But! we acknowledge that a genuine mātauranga Māori approach does not treat “climate change” as an isolated environmental issue. Strong EOIs will clearly articulate the connection between your project goals and outcomes, and the causes and impacts of climate change, whether they be environmental, physical, cultural, spiritual, social, political, legislative, health, justice etc etc. And don’t forget that you can submit your application in te reo Māori!

Do we need to have “qualified” researchers involved in our project?

Not everyone who applies will be immersed in formal academic research landscapes, and we recognise that mātauranga is held by kaumātua and haukāinga, whose knowledge and research experience is embedded in (and springs from) a physical place as opposed to an institution. We do, however, encourage you to think about how your project may build on or connect with other relevant research that may already exist in relation to your kaupapa. This will be one of the areas explored during the RFP stage. If you are unsure of what research might exist in your area feel free to reach out. You can also look at our website to see the kinds of projects that have been funded in the past.

Does the funding have more of a community focus, or is it of equal value to work with Māori Trusts/Incorporations etc?

The funding is intended to support research projects that are clearly able to link the issues and outcomes for a given group (whether that be a whānau, community, trust, or incorporation).. The research should have an impact on that group and we encourage you to look at the assessment criteria (on this page) for more detail around assessment.

You have asked for early applications so that the kāhui can ask pātai of the research if needed. Is it advantageous to put in an early EOI before all the research partnerships are in place, or wait until closer to the deadline when the research has been better finalised with partners?

We do encourage early applications if you feel your project proposal is established and ready. We will only get in touch with you if we think your EOI would benefit from additional information, or if something is unclear. If you already know that you have gaps, it would pay to wait to submit an EOI until you have as much information as possible. 

Are there particular things the funding can’t be spent on?

We will be releasing a more detailed guide to help you formulate the detail of your budget (including exclusions) prior to the RFP deadline.

Do you anticipate heavy subscription to the fund? What is the total funding pool and number of applications you are looking to fund?

Our total pool of available funding is $1.4m and we do expect to receive a high number of EOIs. However, each project will be assessed on its own merits, and there is no cap on the number of projects we are able to fund, only on the total pool itself.

Can I watch a video about this?

Yes you can. Here’s a recording of a conversation hosted by Nadine Hura, Naomi Simmonds with community members interested in applying for Te Taura and Te Aho funding.

Key dates

  • EOIs for both Te Taura and Te Aho open on June 1, 2021
  • EoIs close on different dates:
    • Te Taura EoIs close July 15, 2021, teams notified by August 1, 2021
    • Te Aho EoIs close September 1, 2021, teams notified by September 18, 2021 (slightly extended)

More questions?

Please don’t hesitate to get in touch if you have more questions or would like us to visit your rohe. Contact our Kaitakawaenga: Nadine Hura or Naomi Simmonds.

If you would like to speak with one of our Kāhui Māori members, please contact: Sandy Morrison (Programme Leader).

“Kōtuia ki te aho rangahau kia mau ai,
whiria te taura mātauranga kia ita”

Sew with the thread of research to maintain, plait the rope of ancestral knowledge to tightly bind and sustain.

Drop-in Zoom 1: Te Taura

We encourage all research teams considering a Te Taura application to come along. We will run these in a “meeting” format, so everyone can see each other’s faces, and hopefully build connections. Perhaps these connections may also lead to research collaborations.

Find out more about Te Taura and Te Aho research funds here.

NOTE: EoIs for Te Taura close July 15

Drop-in Zoom 2: Te Aho

Please come along to this Zoom session to talk with us and with other research teams hoping to undertake climate adaptation research, including action research.

In this session, we’ll also take whānau through the Te Aho EoI form, to explain and explore what we hope to learn about your project with each question.

Find out more about Te Taura and Te Aho research funds here.

NOTE: EoIs for Te Aho close September 1

Growing Kai Under Increasing Dry

Landscape of a farmer

A rolling symposium on on drought, climate change and primary sector resilience

Landscape of a farmer

What is a rolling symposium? Three short background webinars, bringing you the latest in climate projections, drought resilience research and land-use science, culminating in an all-day event to generate evidence-based conversation around future drought policy.

Programme for the full-day event:

Register for the all-day event here:

Catch up on the three background videos on YouTube here:

Image tiles describing the 3 webinars

Background information

Over the past few years, the Deep South Challenge, Resilience Challenge and Our Land and Water National Science Challenges, along with several other NZ funded science programmes, have funded research projects that focus on drought and its impacts.

Growing Kai Under Increasing Dry will bring together the latest in climate modelling and adaptation research with farmers, growers and policymakers to better understand how Aotearoa can adapt to our ‘new normal’.

With three background webinars prefacing the symposium, we hope the event itself will create a platform to understand the risks and devise potential solutions.

The capacity of communities to plan for and respond to adverse events plays a part in shaping the resilience within rural communities and helps determine the type of support they may need in recovery.

Recent ministerial briefing 

Come and join us online or in person to be part of this future-focused conversation. Please note:

  • The venue has a limited capacity and is following strict contact tracing protocols  all attendees must be registered.
  • Registration for all of our webinars and the face to face symposium is free.
  • The symposium will be catered.
  • The symposium will also be live streamed for those that cannot attend in person.
Logo array for The Deep South, Resilience to Nature's Challenges, and Our Land and Water National Science Challenges

Future drought could drain primary sector profit

New research by the Deep South Challenge and Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, with the support of Motu Economic and Public Policy Research, finds a strong relationship between more intense future drought and drops in farm profit.

In the year 2100, our 10-year-old children will be 90 years old. Their children – our grandchildren – will be managing farms in a far more tricky climate than we have to negotiate today. Year on year drought is still uncommon in Aotearoa, giving farmers opportunities to recover – financially, mentally and environmentally. But uncontrolled climate change is likely to bring somewhat more severe and far more frequent drought.

This research draws on 70,000 tax returns and temperature and soil moisture data, to understand the historical relationship between local weather and farm profits in both the dairy and sheep+beef industries. Controlling for prices and farm management, the research shows a clear effect. Extrapolating on the clear relationship, future climate change scenarios were tested to understand how much future farm profit might be under pressure, due to reduced soil moisture and increased temperatures.

Under a high climate change scenario (RCP8.5) – the pathway representing little climate action and high economic growth – sheep and beef farmers could see a profit loss of up to 54% by the end of the century, subject to a high degree of uncertainty. Analysis suggests that sheep and beef farms are vulnerable to high temperatures as well as soil moisture loss, while dairy shows an unclear effect of high temperatures, but is clearly sensitive to soil moisture loss (according to this modelling).

Looking only at changes in soil moisture, both dairy and sheep and beef show a decrease in profit by 2100 (an average of 20% for dairy and 7% for sheep and beef). 

A more moderate climate change scenario (RCP4.5) suggests – unsurprisingly – more moderate losses  considering soil moisture changes alone.

Manaaki Whenua research co-lead, Dr Kendon Bell, notes that one potential use of these results is to better understand how climate change might encourage farmers and growers to implement adaptation measures, or even to change what they farm and where. Due to large capital investments, it’s difficult for farmers to change the way they use their land. And the creeping pace of climate change will not likely force land-use change in the near future. Yet this research suggests that land-use change should at least be on the cards in some places.

“However,” Kenny continues, “what’s important is the relative attractiveness of animal versus other land uses. To gain a full understanding of how climate change might affect land-use pressures, we require profit-weather functions for all relevant land uses, in addition to those provided here for dairy and sheep and beef.”

Kenny continues, “Given that animal agriculture is a major contributor to both climate change and water pollution, understanding the extent to which climate change might affect this baseline over time is important for policy considerations over the coming decades.”

“Understanding the scale of the expected impacts of climate change across all sectors is key for central government when considering future budgets for adaptation support. If, as a hypothetical example, the scale of expected net damages to agriculture was 1% of the expected net harm to human health, it would be difficult to justify putting 50% of central government’s adaptation budget into agriculture. However, these quantitative comparisons are not yet straightforward, because the underlying quantitative studies have not yet been executed across all sectors.”

Further analysis, led by Lynn Riggs of Motu Economic Policy and Research, examined the impact of past, present and future drought on employment. Overall, the relationship between drought and employment in New Zealand appears to be complicated, with soil moisture and temperature having different and sometimes offsetting effects within and across industries. Dairy shows the strongest correlation, with the relationship between monthly soil moisture and monthly employment consistently showing up as strong and positive.

In New Zealand, there is very little research about the implications of climate change for society using approaches that measure the historical relationship between weather conditions and economic and social outcomes. This research is among the first to do so. Rural communities may bear a large share of the burden of reducing emissions and our job here has been to try and understand, using real financial data, the size of the additional burden (or benefit) that climate change might impose.

ON Tuesday 18 May, at 11am, Kenny Bell will be presenting a zoom webinar about these results – part of an ongoing Rolling Symposium on Drought: “Growing Kai under Increasing Dry.” We invite interested journalists to first attend the webinar. Register via EventBrite here: https://www.eventbrite.co.nz/e/2-drought-and-the-changing-climate-farm-profits-and-community-resilience-registration-150644741477